Resenting the delay in regularization of their services, contract lecturers have demanded the TRS government to make it a reality before the start of the next academic year. The State government has not been talking about regularization for quite a long time after several stakeholders upped the ante against the proposal of regularization. There is severe dissent against regularization especially in the education department among junior college lecturers.
Though there are different opinions on the legal basis and possibilities of regularization, the contract lecturers are trying their best to convince the government and other stakeholders in this regard. Telangana Government College Contract Lecturer’s Association president C H Kanakachandram said that their demand was to remove the hurdles for regularization of contract lecturers. He said, “Several hundred contract lecturers have been giving their services for many years, but their services have not been recognized. Instead, the rule of district average pass percentage is being used to remove the contract lecturers.”
He demanded that the said rule should not be applied for contract lecturers and their services must be regularized at the earliest. There are various categories of government lecturers working in the junior colleges which includes lecturers recruited through public service commission, promoted teachers, promoted non-teaching staff, re-deployed, minimum time scale lecturers and hourly basis lectures. As per the district average, the pass percentage of the students is seen to calculate the efficiency and need of the contract lecturer. However, a 20 per cent relaxation is given to them. There are around 3,800 contract lecturers working across the State.
On the other hand, Government College Lecturers Association president P Madhusudan Reddy opined that government should not delay the process of regularization in the interest of academics and students.He said that either by regularization or by recruitment through public service commission, State government must fill vacancies in all junior colleges before the next academic year.
He said, “We are not against regularization now, but the State government has to change the service rules first if it wanted to do that so as to suit the Supreme Court ruling on this issue.”
Interestingly, delay in the recruitment process is irking all the pro and anti-regularization parties in the State.
Though there are different opinions on the legal basis and possibilities of regularization, the contract lecturers are trying their best to convince the government and other stakeholders in this regard. Telangana Government College Contract Lecturer’s Association president C H Kanakachandram said that their demand was to remove the hurdles for regularization of contract lecturers. He said, “Several hundred contract lecturers have been giving their services for many years, but their services have not been recognized. Instead, the rule of district average pass percentage is being used to remove the contract lecturers.”
He demanded that the said rule should not be applied for contract lecturers and their services must be regularized at the earliest. There are various categories of government lecturers working in the junior colleges which includes lecturers recruited through public service commission, promoted teachers, promoted non-teaching staff, re-deployed, minimum time scale lecturers and hourly basis lectures. As per the district average, the pass percentage of the students is seen to calculate the efficiency and need of the contract lecturer. However, a 20 per cent relaxation is given to them. There are around 3,800 contract lecturers working across the State.
On the other hand, Government College Lecturers Association president P Madhusudan Reddy opined that government should not delay the process of regularization in the interest of academics and students.He said that either by regularization or by recruitment through public service commission, State government must fill vacancies in all junior colleges before the next academic year.
He said, “We are not against regularization now, but the State government has to change the service rules first if it wanted to do that so as to suit the Supreme Court ruling on this issue.”
Interestingly, delay in the recruitment process is irking all the pro and anti-regularization parties in the State.